In reply to:
The statement 'We need a NEW way forward: https://www.jillstein2024.com/' in response to a conversation about genocide and the Holocaust constitutes public discourse. It engages with a significant public issue by suggesting a political solution and directing readers to a campaign website. The tone is promotional and calls for action, implying that the political campaign addresses the serious issues mentioned in the original conversation.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but redirects to a political campaign that presumably aims to address public concerns, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by suggesting a new political direction in response to serious issues like genocide, aligning with the principle of promoting empathy and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, adhering to the principle of constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By promoting a political campaign, the statement uses influence for societal betterment, aligning with the principle of using influence responsibly. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform responsibly by engaging in a significant public issue, aligning with the principle of responsible use of free speech. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.