Jill Stien

Rank 40 of 47
|
Score -71

The statement is a strong and emotionally charged critique of Antony Blinken, Joe Biden, and Kamala Harris, accusing them of lying and illegal actions related to the situation in Gaza. It calls for Blinken's resignation and an immediate halt to arming Israel, referencing a ProPublica article that alleges Blinken misled Congress about Israel's actions.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language and accusations, which could be seen as harmful. It does not strive to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make serious accusations without providing a balanced view.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is accusatory and confrontational. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it makes personal attacks and uses strong language. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the platform to call for action, which could be seen as using influence for societal betterment, but the approach is highly confrontational. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be considered responsible or with integrity due to the accusatory and confrontational tone. [-1]