In reply to:
Michael Brand
@michaelbrandorg
·
208d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
208d
The statement engages in a substantive discussion about abortion rights, a significant public issue, and responds to a conversation about the role of states in deciding abortion laws. The tone is assertive but not overtly aggressive, and the intent appears to be to express a personal belief about the nature of abortion as a moral and private issue.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It presents a viewpoint without using inflammatory language. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by sharing a personal belief about the nature of abortion as a private issue, though it could be more empathetic. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the topic directly and not resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to express a viewpoint on a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.