Reposted by Vivek Ramaswamy
The statement primarily serves as a promotional activity for a film and does not substantively engage with public issues, policies, or public concerns. It is more focused on marketing the film rather than contributing to civic dialogue.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but it uses charged language that could be seen as divisive. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does use language that could be interpreted as disrespectful towards Kamala Harris and the media. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; instead, it appears to aim at polarizing opinions. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses a confrontational tone and does not provide a platform for discussion. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses influence to promote a film, but it is debatable whether this contributes to the betterment of society.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech but does not necessarily use the platform responsibly or with integrity due to its divisive tone. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.