Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement constitutes public discourse as it addresses a significant public issue related to the security of a former President and the performance of the Secret Service, which has implications for public safety and governmental accountability.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but highlights a serious issue that could lead to improvements in security protocols. It adheres to this principle. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of individuals involved by focusing on institutional failures rather than personal attacks. It adheres to this principle. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to inform the public about a critical issue, which can promote understanding and potentially lead to empathy and compassion for those affected by the security lapses. It adheres to this principle. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement presents facts from a bipartisan Senate committee report and does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It adheres to this principle. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By bringing attention to a significant security lapse, the statement uses its influence to potentially drive improvements in public safety and governmental accountability. It adheres to this principle. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by reporting on a matter of public concern with integrity. It adheres to this principle. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.