Gary Marcus

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 36

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the safety and reliability of Tesla's Full Self-Driving (FSD) technology, a topic of public concern. The tone is analytical and critical, focusing on the implications of the data presented in the graph.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by raising valid safety concerns about the frequency of safety-critical disengagements in Tesla's FSD technology. This is important for public safety and awareness. [+2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It focuses on the technology and data rather than attacking individuals. [+2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement uses words to promote understanding and empathy by highlighting potential safety issues that could affect many people. It encourages a cautious approach to removing human intervention in self-driving cars. [+2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by analyzing the data and expressing concerns about the safety of the technology. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]