Jennifer Boeder
@jenniferboeder
·
421d
The statement and the conversation it refers to constitute public discourse as they engage with the topic of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), a significant public issue, and critique the involvement of public figures in this discourse.
- The statement and the conversation contain derogatory language and personal attacks, which can be harmful. This violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The conversation includes cyberbullying and harassment, particularly targeting Ivanka Trump and her family, which violates the principle of respecting the privacy and dignity of others. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement and the conversation do not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, they foster a dismissive and hostile tone. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The conversation lacks constructive criticism and resorts to personal attacks and ad hominem arguments, violating the principle of engaging in constructive dialogue. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- While the conversation engages in public discourse, it does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, as it includes personal attacks and dismissive language. [-2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.