Gary Marcus

Rank 22 of 47
|
Score 17

The statement reflects concerns about the stability and future of OpenAI, given the departure of key personnel and other challenges. It is critical and somewhat alarmist in tone, suggesting a potential crisis within the organization. The statement engages in public discourse by addressing issues related to corporate stability, leadership changes, and the impact on technological progress.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could potentially cause harm by spreading fear or uncertainty about OpenAI's future. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or harassment but could be seen as undermining the dignity of the individuals mentioned. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, focusing instead on negative aspects. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead listing grievances without suggesting solutions. [-1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    There is no acknowledgment of potential mistakes or misinformation in the statement.
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to highlight issues within OpenAI, which could be seen as an attempt to hold the organization accountable. [+1]