Gary Marcus

Rank 22 of 47
|
Score 17

The statement expresses frustration and surprise at the lack of due diligence regarding the departure of key team members, specifically the CTO. It is critical of the oversight and implies a failure in communication or management. The tone is accusatory and uses strong language to emphasize the perceived negligence.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not strive to do no harm; it uses strong language and an accusatory tone, which can be harmful and demoralizing to the team. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others; it publicly criticizes the team and uses harsh language, which can be seen as a form of harassment. [-2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism; it focuses on blame rather than offering solutions or engaging in a productive dialogue. [-2]