Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement by @joshtpm engages in a discussion about a public figure, Eric Adams, and his potential impact on the city, which constitutes public discourse. The tone is mixed, expressing both support and concern.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It expresses a balanced view, acknowledging both positive and negative aspects. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of Eric Adams by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It raises a concern about potential legal issues without making unfounded accusations. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by presenting a nuanced view of Eric Adams, recognizing his potential benefits to the city while also expressing concern about possible legal troubles. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by discussing both the positive and negative aspects of Eric Adams without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to a civic dialogue about a public figure. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.