The statement expresses shock at Eric Adams' indictment and suggests that New Yorkers deserve better leadership. It references a conversation involving Andrew Yang, who criticizes his opponent for being investigated at multiple levels and calls for new leadership.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a negative judgment about Eric Adams, which could be seen as harmful depending on the context and truth of the indictment.
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does touch on the dignity of Eric Adams by mentioning his indictment.
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on criticism.
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is a reaction to an indictment and a call for better leadership without engaging in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.The statement uses the speaker's influence to call for better leadership, which can be seen as an attempt to better society.
Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly, though it could be more constructive.