The statement constitutes public discourse as it addresses a public issue related to the accessibility and transparency of a public official, Tom Kean, to the media and, by extension, to the public. The reporter is highlighting a concern about the lack of communication from a public figure, which is a matter of public interest.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a factual account of the reporter's experience. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of Tom Kean by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It simply states a fact about his lack of communication. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement could promote understanding and empathy by highlighting the challenges reporters face in getting information from public officials. However, it does not explicitly promote compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by pointing out a specific issue without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the reporter's platform responsibly to inform the public about an issue of transparency and accountability. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.