The statement discusses the results of a Marist poll in the context of the 'Mark Robinson situation' and compares it to previous polls. The tone is analytical and factual, focusing on the consistency of polling data despite recent events. The accompanying image provides data from various polls to support the statement.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm and is presented in a neutral, factual manner. It adheres to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing data and context about the polling results. It helps readers comprehend the impact (or lack thereof) of recent events on public opinion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by focusing on data and analysis rather than personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By providing factual information and analysis, the statement uses its platform to inform the public, which can be seen as contributing to the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.