Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement from Mayor Adams' attorney addresses a public issue involving federal agents and the mayor, which constitutes public discourse. The tone is defensive and critical of the federal agents' actions, suggesting an overreach or unnecessary display of force. The statement aims to defend Mayor Adams and criticize the federal agents' approach.
- The statement does not appear to cause direct harm but could contribute to public distrust in federal agencies, which might indirectly cause harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of Mayor Adams but criticizes the federal agents, potentially undermining their dignity and professionalism. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on defending the mayor and criticizing the agents. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is more accusatory and does not offer a path for resolution or understanding. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the attorney's influence to defend the mayor and criticize the federal agents, which could be seen as using influence for a specific agenda rather than the betterment of society. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.