Gary Marcus

The statement by @GaryMarcus constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about the limitations of Large Language Models (LLMs) in AI and the need for more truth-seeking AI systems. The conversation addresses public concerns about AI technology, its development, and its implications for society.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a professional critique of AI technology. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement promotes understanding by sharing an essay that presumably elaborates on the author's views and suggestions for future AI development. [+1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive dialogue by responding to a question and providing a resource for further reading. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses the author's influence to contribute to the betterment of society by advocating for more truth-seeking AI systems. [+1]
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity. [+1]