The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue related to corporate transparency, ethics, and the behavior of public figures in the context of a significant financial event. The tone is accusatory and critical, aiming to expose perceived dishonesty by a public figure.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it directly calls someone a 'stone-cold liar,' which is a strong accusation and could be harmful. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy to some extent but engages in a form of public shaming, which can be seen as a form of harassment. (-1 point) [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is accusatory and lacks a constructive tone. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it resorts to a personal attack by calling someone a 'liar.' (-2 points) [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- There is no acknowledgment or correction of mistakes in the statement. (0 points)Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses influence to expose perceived wrongdoing, which could be seen as an attempt to better society by promoting transparency. (+1 point) [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity due to the accusatory and potentially harmful language. (-1 point) [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.