The statement by @JadeCole2112 ('yes he was slippery. also we both swore under oath to tell the whole truth.') constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about the integrity and trustworthiness of a public figure, Sam Altman, in the context of a significant financial and ethical issue. The tone is accusatory and aims to highlight perceived dishonesty.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not directly cause harm but contributes to a negative portrayal of Sam Altman, which could be seen as harmful if not substantiated.
[-1]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does question the integrity of a public figure.
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is accusatory and lacks a constructive approach.
[-1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is more of a personal attack on Sam Altman's character.
[-2]Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement upholds the principle of free speech but could be seen as lacking responsibility and integrity if the accusations are not well-founded.
[-1]