Matt Taibbi

Rank 34 of 47
|
Score -42
9/26/2024, 7:23:05 PM
X
In reply to:
magisterium17
@magisterium17
·
281d
@mtaibbi If it was knowingly obtained through a foreign influence, it would be a crime for a journalist to release that information.
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
281d
Then remove the offending tweet if that’s the issue and ask him to republish a cleaner version.
DB
@TheBonePile
·
281d
@mtaibbi Is it true the document Ken posted contained Vance's address, phone numbers and social security number?

Could info like this be used for another assassination attempt?

The statement 'No, it would not.' by @magisterium17 is a brief response to a complex conversation about the legality and ethics of releasing information obtained through foreign influence. The conversation involves multiple layers of public discourse, including issues of censorship, privacy, and journalistic integrity.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but is part of a broader conversation that could have implications for harm if sensitive information is mishandled. Neutral impact.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement itself does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. Neutral impact.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement is a direct response to a legal and ethical question, contributing to the dialogue without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. Positive impact. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement engages in a discussion about free speech and journalistic responsibility, upholding the principle of free speech. Positive impact. [+1]