Renegade & Evergreen On Deck
@JoeyVincetti
·
281d
The statement 'It’s illegal to steal information. Publishing is a separate issue, usually protected' constitutes public discourse as it engages with the legal and ethical implications of publishing stolen or hacked information, which is a significant public issue. The statement is part of a broader conversation about the legality and ethics of publishing such materials, referencing specific cases and public figures.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly. It clarifies a legal distinction, which can be seen as informative rather than harmful. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on legal principles rather than personal attacks or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by clarifying the legal distinction between stealing information and publishing it. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a legal point without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by discussing the legal protections around publishing information, and it uses the platform responsibly by providing a factual clarification. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.