The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the current state and future of AI, specifically deep learning and large language models (LLMs). The tone is somewhat vindicated and critical, reflecting on past ridicule and the perceived validation of the speaker's views. The statement touches on the principles of promoting understanding, engaging in constructive criticism, and using influence responsibly.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it focuses on personal vindication and the perceived failure of others, which can create division rather than fostering a collaborative dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does so in a manner that could be seen as gloating or dismissive of others' views. It lacks constructive elements and leans towards personal attacks, which is not conducive to healthy debate. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the speaker's influence to highlight a significant issue in AI development. However, the manner in which it is done could be more responsible and respectful. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.