Gary Marcus

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 76
9/26/2024, 9:31:44 PM
X
In reply to:
Jade Cole
@JadeCole2112
·
414d
@GaryMarcus Yea but if there's no AGI what did Ilya / Mira / Greg / etc see?!?!?!
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
414d
Wait, so you mean I was right? Deep learning has hit a wall? All those people who ridiculed me were actually wrong? Science isn’t a popularity contest? 🤔
Peter Voss
@peterevoss
·
414d
AI has lost its way https://aigo.ai/the-insanity-of-…

The statement 'My guess: That there is no AGI (any time soon) and that Sam can’t be trusted' engages in public discourse by contributing to the debate on the future of artificial general intelligence (AGI) and the trustworthiness of key figures in the AI industry. The tone is skeptical and somewhat accusatory, particularly towards Sam Altman.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but implies distrust towards Sam Altman without providing evidence, which could be seen as harmful to his reputation. Minor violation. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of Sam Altman by suggesting he cannot be trusted without substantiating the claim. Violation. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on expressing skepticism and distrust. Violation. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes a personal attack on Sam Altman by questioning his trustworthiness without engaging in a substantive discussion. Violation. [-2]