Jill Stien

Rank 38 of 47
|
Score -97

The statement 'ONE SOLUTION‼️ REVOLUTION🇵🇸 STARTING NOW AT PERSHING SQ' appears to be a call to action for a public demonstration or movement, potentially related to a political or social issue concerning Palestine. The use of strong language like 'REVOLUTION' suggests a significant engagement with a public issue, making it a part of public discourse. The link to a website further indicates an attempt to mobilize or inform the public.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement's call for 'REVOLUTION' could be interpreted as inciting action that may lead to harm, thus potentially violating the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not directly engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the context of 'REVOLUTION' could indirectly lead to such behaviors, depending on the content of the linked website. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses a forceful tone that may polarize rather than unite. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is a unilateral call to action without room for discussion or differing viewpoints. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to mobilize people, but whether it is for the betterment of society is subjective and depends on the nature of the revolution being called for.
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does not provide enough context to determine if it is done responsibly and with integrity.