Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement critiques an interview with Kamala Harris, focusing on the lack of questions about significant geopolitical issues such as U.S. troop deployment to the Middle East, Israeli terrorism attacks, and potential conflict with Hezbollah. The tone is critical and suggests a perceived failure in addressing important public concerns.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but implies a critique of the interview's content.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It focuses on the content of the interview rather than personal attacks.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on critiquing the interview's scope.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the interview but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to raise concerns about the interview's content responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.