Reposted by Robert Costa
The statement constitutes public discourse as it addresses a significant public issue: the potential change to the filibuster rule by Democrats if they maintain a majority. The statement reflects a political leader's perspective on a procedural aspect of legislative governance, which is a matter of public concern.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a straightforward expression of a political opinion. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on a political prediction rather than fostering dialogue.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It is a critique of a potential political action rather than an attack on individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly. It provides a viewpoint on a significant legislative issue without resorting to inflammatory language. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.