The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the effectiveness and suitability of Eric Adams as the mayor of New York City. The statement calls for his resignation, which is a substantive engagement with a public concern.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as harmful to Eric Adams' reputation. However, it is framed as a call for action based on perceived ineffectiveness, which is a legitimate part of public discourse. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It critiques Adams' effectiveness as a mayor, which is a valid public concern. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on Adams' effectiveness and suitability for office, which is a legitimate area for public critique. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes, but this principle is not directly relevant in this context.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to express a viewpoint on a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.