Marianne Williamson

Rank 13 of 47

Score 130

@0xMemeDealer I agree that the stories of the victims are too often lost in these instances, but to me that's separate from the issue of capital punishment.

9/27/2024, 5:55:31 AM

In reply to:

C H ₳ D Z ł Ⱡ Ⱡ ₳ | e r a

@0xMemeDealer

203d

Yes, ending 3 husbands lives in premeditated cold blood, 2 of them fathers, was absurdly evil.

Hopefully he felt excruciating pain as the feeling left his body slowly, like his victims.

I agree.

Marianne Williamson

@marwilliamson

203d

@laurenk_gill Absolutely evil.

The statement engages in a discussion about the ethical considerations of capital punishment and the importance of remembering the victims. It addresses a significant public issue, making it a part of public discourse.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement strives to do no harm by focusing on the ethical debate surrounding capital punishment and the importance of remembering victims, which is a sensitive and respectful approach. [+1]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It maintains a respectful tone. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement promotes understanding and empathy by acknowledging the importance of the victims' stories and the ethical considerations of capital punishment. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a disagreement on the issue of capital punishment without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]