The statement and accompanying images discuss the internal turmoil at OpenAI, suggesting that potential investors might face legal consequences for not performing due diligence. The tone is critical and cautionary, aiming to highlight the risks associated with investing in a company experiencing significant internal conflict.
- The statement aims to warn potential investors about the risks, which can be seen as an attempt to prevent harm. However, the language used is quite strong and could be seen as alarmist. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy of individuals by not naming specific people involved in the chaos, but it does mention the company and its executives in a negative light, which could be seen as damaging to their dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it focuses on the negative aspects of the situation. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes a strong assertion about potential legal consequences without offering a balanced view or solutions. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to influence potential investors, but it does so in a way that could be seen as fear-mongering rather than responsibly informing the public. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.