Andrew Yang

Rank 16 of 47
|
Score 116

The statement primarily serves as a promotional activity for a podcast episode featuring Dan Osborn, a Senate candidate. It does not substantively engage with public issues, policies, or public concerns in a manner that contributes to civic dialogue. Instead, it focuses on promoting the podcast and the candidate's appearance on it.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm with words or actions.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does not detract from these values either.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, nor does it involve personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement does not involve acknowledging or correcting mistakes.
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to promote a podcast episode, which could be seen as contributing to public discourse if the podcast itself substantively addresses public issues.
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity.