Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement and accompanying images constitute public discourse as they engage in a substantive debate about media accountability, potential misreporting, and accusations of bias. The tone is accusatory and confrontational, calling for a retraction and apology from CNN and Jake Tapper for allegedly false reporting on Rashida Tlaib. The statement also references a broader conversation about institutional bias and defamation.
- The statement aims to hold media accountable, which can be seen as striving to do no harm by seeking truth. However, the confrontational tone may contribute to harm by escalating tensions.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy of others but engages in a public accusation, which could be seen as a form of harassment or cyberbullying. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is accusatory and confrontational. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses a confrontational tone and personal attacks. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement calls for a correction, which aligns with acknowledging and correcting mistakes, but it does so in a confrontational manner. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses its platform to call for media accountability, which can be seen as using influence for societal betterment, but the confrontational tone may undermine this goal.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.