In reply to:
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a substantive public issue: the impact of AI in smartphones on society and human development. The tone is cautionary, aiming to inform and warn the public about potential risks associated with AI technology in smartphones.
- The statement strives to do no harm by warning the public about potential risks, aligning with the principle. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and caution regarding the use of AI in smartphones, aligning with the principle. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, aligning with the principle. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to inform the public about potential societal risks, aligning with the principle. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a significant public issue, aligning with the principle. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.