In reply to:
Alice (e/nya)šāā¬
@Alice_comfy
Ā·
409d
The statement in question is a reply within a conversation about the financial and legal structure of OpenAI, which is a public issue involving corporate governance, nonprofit status, and financing. Therefore, it constitutes public discourse.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a neutral inquiry seeking clarification and additional information.Ā [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Ā [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by seeking more information and clarification on a complex issue.Ā [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by asking for links to the law, which can help in understanding the legal context. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.Ā [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to a meaningful discussion on a public issue.Ā [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.