Gary Marcus

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 76
9/28/2024, 7:38:19 PM
X
In reply to:
John Berry (aniccia.bsky.social)
@aniccia
·
409d
@GaryMarcus Whoa, SAE J3016 calls Waymo's type of system "cooperative" and specifically warns against calling it "autonomous." Waymo's system is closer to an exceptionally good ADAS with a so unacceptably bad ADS that it depends on human assistance to handle ordinary conditions.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
409d
It is astonishing to me that some people still have not learned the difference between genuinely autonomous vehicles (which Waymo is actively testing in some warm-weather cities in CA, AZ, and TX) and driver-assist (like Tesla FSD, which must have a human in the loop at all…

The statement engages in a substantive discussion about the autonomy of driving systems, specifically addressing the nuances between different levels of automation and the terminology used to describe them. The tone is analytical and aims to clarify the extent of autonomy in Waymo's systems, contributing to the public discourse on autonomous vehicles.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by providing a reasoned analysis rather than making unfounded claims. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by clarifying the complexities of autonomous vehicle technology and the terminology used. [+2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by responding to a previous comment with additional information and analysis, without resorting to personal attacks. [+2]