Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement and the accompanying images address a public issue involving the conduct of a journalist and the response from the WNBA Players Association. The tone is critical and defensive, aiming to protect the dignity and reputation of the players while condemning the journalist's actions.
- The statement aims to protect the players from harm by criticizing the journalist's actions, which are perceived as harmful. This aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of the players by defending them against what is seen as an abusive interview. However, it directly criticizes the journalist, which could be seen as a violation of respecting her dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy for the players by highlighting their hard work and achievements. However, it does not extend the same empathy towards the journalist. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of the journalist's actions but does so in a manner that could be seen as a personal attack, which violates the principle of constructive criticism and dialogue. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to advocate for the betterment of the players and the league, aligning with the principle of using influence for societal betterment. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.