Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement criticizes OpenAI's actions and calls for legal oversight, engaging with public issues related to technology, corporate governance, and democracy. It has a critical tone and aims to provoke thought and action regarding the regulation of AI technologies.
- The statement does not use harmful language but is critical of OpenAI's actions. It adheres to the principle of doing no harm with words and actions.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects the privacy and dignity of individuals while criticizing corporate actions.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting concerns about democratic processes and corporate accountability. It encourages readers to consider the implications of AI development.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of OpenAI and Sam Altman, focusing on their actions rather than personal attacks. It adheres to the principle of constructive dialogue.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to advocate for societal betterment by calling for laws and independent oversight of AI technologies.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles and uses the platform responsibly to raise awareness about important public issues.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.