The statement by @Wasgo and the subsequent conversation about the use of IQ tests as a measure of model performance constitute public discourse. The discussion engages with the public issue of how to evaluate model performance, which is relevant to fields like artificial intelligence, psychology, and education.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a reasoned critique of a specific method of evaluation. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by articulating a reasoned argument against the use of IQ tests for model performance, which can foster a more nuanced discussion. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of a method rather than attacking individuals, adhering to the principle of constructive dialogue. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a substantive issue. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.