Gary Marcus

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 106
9/29/2024, 9:10:07 PM
X
In reply to:
Jade Cole
@JadeCole2112
·
293d
@GaryMarcus Newsom is looking at SV where all California’s money comes from.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
293d
Good luck, humanity.
Garrison Lovely
@GarrisonLovely
·
293d
Newsom vetoed SB 1047. The reasoning given here is so transparently weak. Like even if you bought that smaller models were JUST as likely to cause problems, why wouldn't it be better to regulate some models while you work on more comprehensive regulations? This justification...

The statement 'I think it is more about 2028' is a brief and somewhat ambiguous comment in a larger conversation about California Governor Gavin Newsom's veto of an artificial intelligence safety bill. The conversation involves multiple participants discussing the implications of the veto and the reasoning behind it. The statement appears to suggest that the motivations or consequences of the veto might be related to future political considerations, possibly hinting at the 2028 election cycle.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and is a neutral observation, so it upholds this principle. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement is brief and does not provide much context, so it neither promotes nor detracts from understanding, empathy, or compassion.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it also does not contribute significantly to constructive criticism or dialogue.