In reply to:
Eric Williamson
@edubble_u
·
82d
The statement by @NikkiHaley ('If you listened to the podcast, you would hear that I did. Thanks.') constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue (housing policy) and responds to a critique related to political beliefs and values.
- The statement does not cause harm with words and actions. It is a neutral response to a critique. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it is a polite response that encourages listening to the podcast for more information.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the critique without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.