The statement by Silver lining critiques the authenticity of industry calls for responsible AI in the context of Governor Gavin Newsom's veto of SB 1047. It suggests that these calls are merely public relations tactics rather than genuine efforts to promote responsible AI practices.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but implies that some industry players are not sincere in their calls for responsible AI, which could be seen as a critique rather than harmful speech.
[+1]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It critiques industry actions without targeting specific individuals in a harmful manner.
[+1]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement could promote understanding by highlighting a perceived discrepancy between public statements and actual practices in the AI industry. However, it does not explicitly promote empathy or compassion.
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in constructive criticism of the industry's actions regarding responsible AI. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
[+2]Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.By calling out what it perceives as insincere actions, the statement aims to use its influence to push for more genuine efforts in responsible AI, which can be seen as an attempt to better society.
[+2]Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to responsibly critique industry practices, aiming to hold them accountable.
[+2]