In reply to:
Jim Schneider
@vaoncsurgeon
·
163d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
163d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about a historical political event and media representation, which are public issues.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It is a factual correction or clarification. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does aim to clarify a factual point, which can contribute to informed discourse.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by pointing out a perceived discrepancy in media reporting without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to a factual discussion. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.