Marianne Williamson

Rank 8 of 47
|
Score 190
9/30/2024, 4:29:22 AM
X
In reply to:
Atomic Purple 🇵🇸
@AtomicPurple90s
·
82d
@marwilliamson @NicholsUprising Hopefully he didn’t see this before he passed, he wouldve been fuckin disgusted

https://www.thedailybeast.com/ma…
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
83d
@NicholsUprising In 2001 I was invited by Coretta Scott King to speak on MLK Day at the Ebenezer Baptist Church in Atlanta. I was nervous because Barbara Bush was also there. But Kristofferson was in the audience - loudly and generously and joyfully supporting my views, giving me the energy and…
John Nichols
@NicholsUprising
·
83d
Kris Kristofferson was a Rhodes Scholar, an Army Captain and a helicopter pilot. A critic of U.S. foreign policy, he opposed wars in Latin America and the Middle East and spoke out against apartheid. He defended family farmers, wrote some damn fine songs and sang mightily!

RIP

The statement 'No, he knew that the media lies. I did not support Trump.' is a response to a conversation about a public figure's potential reaction to a controversial topic. The tone is defensive and aims to clarify the speaker's stance on media trustworthiness and political support. The statement touches upon public issues such as media credibility and political alignment, making it part of public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but implies distrust in the media, which can contribute to broader societal skepticism. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on the speaker's views rather than attacking others. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more about defending a position.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in dialogue but does not offer constructive criticism or foster a deeper discussion.