Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue related to the reliability and ethical use of AI-generated content, as well as the integrity of professional services.
- The statement uses strong and offensive language, which can be harmful and does not strive to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement includes cyberbullying and hate speech by using derogatory language towards the wedding planner and generalized negative comments about generative AI. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it expresses frustration and anger without constructive dialogue. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in personal attacks and ad hominem arguments against the wedding planner and generative AI, rather than constructive criticism. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- While the statement exercises free speech, it does so irresponsibly by using offensive language and personal attacks. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.