In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
251d
The statement 'Going fast, but orthogonal to our destination…' is part of a conversation that appears to be discussing technological advancements and their implications. This conversation involves public figures and touches on public issues related to technology and policy, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a critique of the direction of technological progress, which is a legitimate part of public discourse.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more of a critical observation.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by pointing out a perceived misdirection in technological efforts. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to a discussion on technological progress and policy. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.