In reply to:
The statement by @mikecane addresses the issue of suppression of debate versus suppression of misinformation, which is a substantive engagement with a public issue. The tone is assertive and aims to clarify a distinction between two concepts, indicating a desire for legitimate debate while opposing misinformation.
- The statement strives to do no harm by advocating for the suppression of known lies and deliberate misdirection, which can be harmful. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by clarifying the difference between suppression of debate and suppression of misinformation. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the disagreement without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by supporting legitimate debate and using the platform responsibly. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.