Gary Marcus

Rank 18 of 47
|
Score 84
10/1/2024, 4:38:54 PM
X
In reply to:
Max Kesin
@nlpnyc
·
246d
@GaryMarcus @BillGates Lake Wobegon. Press in the 20s was absolutely wild. Post WW2 things were more reasonable, but that was a temporary effect. You cannot, cannot give power to control information to some (typically party-affiliated) branch of Gov, that's end of USA. (which is y I can't vote for KH)
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
246d
@nlpnyc @BillGates JFK lived before the weaponized misinformation age, in an era where fact-checking was widely assumed to be a good thing.
Max Kesin
@nlpnyc
·
246d
@GaryMarcus @BillGates Today you're saving them from skipping a shot, tomorrow you tell them whatever is necessary for you to say in power comfortably (see covid origins). If you want this policy, go to another country & live with the consequences. (actually you already moved?)
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
246d
Am with @BillGates on this. I would rather not have more people die needlessly just to make a (simplistic) point about free speech.
End Wokeness
@EndWokeness
·
247d
Bill Gates wants the world to create an AI program that bans harmful speech: "For example, causing people to skip a vax"

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the quality of life in different historical periods and expressing dissatisfaction with the current era. It implies a critique of contemporary societal conditions compared to the post-WW2 era and the 1890s.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but expresses a negative opinion about the current era, which could be seen as a form of constructive criticism.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects the privacy and dignity of others.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on expressing dissatisfaction.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism by comparing different historical periods. However, it does not provide a detailed argument or solution, which limits its constructive nature.