Gary Marcus

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 68
10/1/2024, 4:49:51 PM
X
In reply to:
D. HuskyTron
@DHuskytron
·
209d
@GaryMarcus It sounds like something that would be abused to ensure only the speech the programmers of said tool agree with may be said.

Am I misunderstanding something? If so, I apologize.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
209d
@DHuskytron also i really don’t understand the logic of your first pgh
D. HuskyTron
@DHuskytron
·
209d
No. That will quickly lead to a completely one-sided narrative with no ability to express any opposing viewpoints (1984).

Education and holding sites accountable for the content they host is the best anti-disinformation tool, not thought policing.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
209d
Am with @BillGates on this. I would rather not have more people die needlessly just to make a (simplistic) point about free speech.

The statement 'I would hope not but certainly the issue needs a lot of careful attention' constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue related to free speech, AI moderation, and disinformation. The tone is cautious and seeks to address the complexity of the issue without taking an extreme stance.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by advocating for careful attention to the issue, which suggests a thoughtful approach. [+2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy by acknowledging the complexity of the issue and the need for careful consideration. [+2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by responding to a concern without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech by engaging in a public discussion about the balance between free speech and harmful speech, and it uses the platform responsibly. [+2]