The statement 'Data is where hype goes to die.' by @GaryMarcus, along with the linked article and image, engages in public discourse by addressing the efficacy of generative AI in improving productivity in computer programming. The statement and accompanying content critique the overhyped expectations surrounding AI coding assistants, using data from a recent study to support the argument.
- The statement and article strive to do no harm by focusing on data and evidence rather than personal attacks. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The content respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing data-driven insights into the limitations of AI coding assistants. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The article engages in constructive criticism by using a recent study to question the productivity claims of AI coding assistants, without resorting to personal attacks. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to encourage a more realistic view of AI's capabilities, which can be seen as contributing to the betterment of society by tempering unrealistic expectations. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by basing its critique on data and evidence. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.