In reply to:
Chuck Russell 🍒🍒🍒
@cichuck
·
82d
The statement by @cichuck ('I have paid more dues than maybe anyone alive - but the yield is getting lower and lower.') constitutes public discourse as it engages in a broader conversation about the credibility and reliability of public figures and their statements, which is a public concern. The tone is defensive and suggests a sense of frustration or disillusionment.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but the defensive tone could escalate the conversation. It neither significantly aligns with nor violates the principle of doing no harm.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It maintains a level of respect for privacy and dignity. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It is more of a personal defense and does not address the substance of the disagreement constructively. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.