In reply to:
Dan
@KettlebellDan
·
82d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
82d
The statement 'Just for starters, Trumps S Ct nominees overturned Roe v Wade' constitutes public discourse as it engages with a significant public issue, namely the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, which has substantial implications for women's rights and public policy.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it could be seen as provocative depending on the audience's stance on the issue. It is neutral in tone and factual in content.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It focuses on a public issue rather than attacking individuals. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more of a factual assertion without elaboration or context.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It addresses a specific action (the overturning of Roe v. Wade) rather than attacking individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to engage in a significant public issue responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.