Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 120
In reply to:

The statement by @GaryMarcus addresses a public issue related to the ethics of sharing content and giving proper credit on social media platforms. The tone is defensive and somewhat accusatory, aiming to justify the practice of not including direct links due to platform algorithms. The intent is to defend against accusations of prioritizing engagement over proper attribution.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as contributing to a hostile environment by responding defensively to criticism. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It maintains a level of respect for privacy and dignity. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement attempts to promote understanding by explaining the rationale behind the actions, but it does not fully succeed in fostering empathy or compassion.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in dialogue but does not fully avoid personal attacks, as it accuses others of hostility and unpleasantness. [-1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to explain a position, though it could be more responsible in tone. [+1]