Gary Marcus

Rank 23 of 47
|
Score 109

The statement critiques Vance's ability to avoid addressing facts related to January 6th, implying a negative view of his actions. The tone is sarcastic and critical, focusing on Vance's perceived evasion rather than engaging in a substantive discussion of the issues surrounding January 6th.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but uses sarcasm, which can be seen as a form of verbal attack. This could be considered a minor violation of striving to do no harm. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does not fully respect the dignity of Vance by using a sarcastic tone. This is a minor violation of respecting privacy and dignity. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. Instead, it uses sarcasm and a personal attack on Vance's character, which is a significant violation of engaging in constructive criticism and avoiding ad hominem arguments. [-2]